Editorial Policy

Last updated: September 9, 2026

This policy describes the standard MCQPK uses when adding, reviewing and correcting educational content.

Purpose and independence

Our content is designed for study and practice. MCQPK is independent and is not an official publication of any examination commission or testing organisation.

Sources

Questions may be based on past-paper material, standard academic references, official publications and community submissions. A label referring to an exam or past paper should be used only when that provenance can be supported. Current-affairs answers should be checked against dated, authoritative sources.

Answer review

Reviewers should check the wording, available options and marked answer together. Where a question is ambiguous, time-sensitive or depends on a disputed fact, it should be clarified, dated, archived or removed rather than presented as universally correct.

Explanations and automation

Explanations should add useful context and cite a source where the claim warrants one. Automated tools may assist drafting or organisation, but generated material should not be treated as verified merely because it was produced automatically.

Community contributions

User-submitted questions and comments may be moderated, edited or rejected. Submission does not guarantee publication. Contributors should not submit copyrighted question banks or material they are not permitted to share.

Corrections

Readers can report suspected errors through a question's comments or the contact page. See the Corrections Policy for the information that helps us investigate.